[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re:



At 06:03 AM 2/13/96 GMT, John Lull wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Feb 1996 13:41:04 -0500 (EST), Padgett wrote:
>
>> If it were properly and legally decided that communications 
>> with anon.penet.fi is against "national interest" then the sovereign has 
>> not only the "right" but the *duty* to block/monitor such communications.
>
>Bullpuckey.  One could just as legitimately say:
>
>  "If it were properly and legally decided that publication of the
>  Los Angeles Times is against "national interest" then the sovereign
>  has not only the "right" but the *duty* to block such publication."

"Right on", as they used to say.  Padgett's clueless.  He'll try to justify
ANYTHING.