[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Internet Privacy Guaranteed ad (POTP Jr.)

To: "Richard J. Coleman" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Internet Privacy Guaranteed ad (POTP Jr.)
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:01:18 -0500
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Feb 1996 22:40:08 EST." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


"Richard J. Coleman" writes:
> I'm way out of my league here, but using a small OTP to create a
> larger OTP seems impossible on information theoretic grounds.

No, you are correct.

Perry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Internet Privacy Guaranteed ad (POTP Jr.)
  - From: Simon Spero <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Internet Privacy Guaranteed ad (POTP Jr.)
  - From: "Richard J. Coleman" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: PING packets illegal?
Next by Date: Re: Online Zakat Payment: Religious tithe.
Prev by thread: Re: Internet Privacy Guaranteed ad (POTP Jr.)
Next by thread: Re: Internet Privacy Guaranteed ad (POTP Jr.)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread