[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: should we use same nym on multiple servers?
At 6:45 AM 2/20/96, Anonymous wrote:
> With the additional nym servers coming on the scene comes the
>question of whether or not to "claim" our alpha.c2 nym on the other
>ones, too. E.g., if we are [email protected], should we also become
>[email protected] and [email protected], too?
You know, [email protected] sent me a message demanding that he be
given the name [email protected] on my system, for exactly this reason.
I told him to fuck off.
Now he's threatening to sue me. Do you folks think this is right?
(More to the point, this example shows that whatever "anonymous" thinks
about "claims" on nyms, it's pointless. Even if _some_ nyms are apparently
persistent across nymservers, all it takes is the possibility of this not
to be so for the fiction to collapse. The best way to prove that
"[email protected]" is really the same True Name (or in alliance
with) as "[email protected]" is to show that either can read the messages
encrypted to the other.)
--Tim May
Boycott espionage-enabled software!
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
[email protected] 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^756839 - 1 | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."