[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: should we use same nym on multiple servers?

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: should we use same nym on multiple servers?
From: John Perry <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 06:38:56 -0600
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Feb 1996 07:45:11 +0100." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

>>>>> "Anonymous" == Anonymous  <[email protected]> writes:


    Anonymous> harder to keep our real ID secret.  (E.g., an
    Anonymous> oversimplified scenario would be if an attacker sends a
    Anonymous> message to all three nyms, then watches three PGP
    Anonymous> conventionally encrypted messages arrive in our
    Anonymous> mailbox.)

	What's wrong with having a nym point to yet another nym on a
different server? Has anyone thought of that?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: should we use same nym on multiple servers?
  - From: John Perry <[email protected]>

References:
- should we use same nym on multiple servers?
  - From: [email protected] (Anonymous)

Prev by Date: Re: PGP
Next by Date: Re: Windows 95 encryption shell extension
Prev by thread: Re: should we use same nym on multiple servers?
Next by thread: Re: should we use same nym on multiple servers?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread