[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Schneier Attacks

To: John Young <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Schneier Attacks
From: [email protected] (Andreas Bogk)
Date: 22 Feb 1996 01:37:30 +0100
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: John Young's message of Wed, 21 Feb 1996 14:40:26 -0500
Organization: ART+COM GmbH Berlin
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>>>>> "John" == John Young <[email protected]> writes:

    John>    Schneier says in a March SciAm brief on Kocher's timing
    John> attack: "In theory there are other attacks. You can measure
    John> power consumption or heat dissipation of a chip; timing is
    John> just one way."

And you could measure emissions, without even getting close to the
chip itself.

Andreas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAgUBMSu6x0yjTSyISdw9AQHHwAP/TrNlmlJkHvojhI0F2ZXykIfXWqJOSjD3
/EqWvhM3e/l3N2OnrMelAhJDf3c/m6E823vQpwYMIRbOwdRkBgEGM/WJGyAPpLqU
n0sgNrfD0E+zq9wKCw6HorFJc/UNIz6T3A9XGTv9ymK+eWdOjMdL0HLyedTdOgmh
l74jDaRIYzg=
=aMZl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Schneier Attacks
  - From: John Young <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: BLO_bak
Next by Date: IMC resolving security workshop
Prev by thread: Re: Schneier Attacks
Next by thread: Re: Schneier Attacks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread