[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: going back to stone axes
At 02:32 PM 3/1/96 +1100, Steven Legg <[email protected]> wrote:
>DistinguishedName wasn't defined the way it was because of ASN.1.
I'd always assumed it was just the ugly X.400 email naming convention.
>No one at Telstra Research would want to replace DistinguishedName with
>a byte string because of all the constant reparsing, cutting and splicing
>that would entail. We would end up writing more code, not less. Given the
>sort of heavy duty processing we do to DNs, trying to pack a DN into a
>string is considered brain dead. Those rich semantics matter to us.
I don't see how a DN is any better than an Internet-style Domain Naming Service
name, except that it puts a bunch of pre-defined labels on subdomain parts
which can generally be guessed from context and aren't very relevant
to computer programs. Compare
[email protected]
vs. /FN=Joseph/Ln=User/NN=Joe/OU=Purchasing/O=First.National.Organization.-
[for].Research.[and].Development/S=Academic/C=AU/
Is there really any additional information in the latter, except possibly
some detail you could have looked up with a "whois" request?
#--
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart, [email protected] / [email protected] +1-415-442-2215
# http://www.idiom.com/~wcs Pager +1-408-787-1281