Re: Truelly Random Numbers

[Mutant Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Timothy C. May wrote:
[..]
> Now, is the modulus, n = pq, any more factorable than if a "more
> random" source of p and q were used?
> 
> (I am actually asking this as a real question. Does anyone know if
> factoring is significantly easier for such not-completely-random
> numbers? I would expect that in theory it is, but in practice this is
> not a useful point of entry into factoring n. Just a hunch.)
> 

Only if I can have a good enough idea of the non-random method for
generating numbers, or if I can find some useful statistical correlations
in your numbers.  (And then again, what do you mean by "significantly
easier"?  Knowing 1 bit reduces the work by half, but with orders or
thousands of bits, it's not much help.)

Whether I can realisitically reproduce or work with that non-random
method of key generation is another matter, though.

Rob.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMTkHYCoZzwIn1bdtAQHdSgGAzgoS4Y1BQuI5hzlsLsfnoKyzVALJD3TR
Mm5Dmu/I5N3Rnk9TxNviwLFjKp6Fd35Z
=UnWo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----