Re: Remailers run by spooks

[Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>]

On Mon, 4 Mar 1996, Just Rich wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> I have no doubt that the CIA can break 1000-bit keys on a case-by-case
> basis, *if they decide to allocate the resources*. I think it's possible
> that some remailers are run by spooks. However, I seriously doubt that
> anyone is breaking stuff routinely, and I think the web of trust is pretty
> good.


What does the web of trust currently have to say about the political 
reliability of remailers?


> However, I also have no doubt that Strassmann and Marlow are spreading
> disinformation and exaggerating their capabilities in an attempt to break
> the web of trust and incite a witch hunt. It won't work. The answer in any
> case is more use of remailers, not less. Just turn up the noise level. 
> You already know that nothing is 100% secure, but you do what you can. 
> It's a war of attrition.

And thus the winner will be the one who makes it the hardest for the 
other to fight, not who inflicts the most casualities.

> 
> - -rich
> - ---
> [This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
> means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
> signature and forwarded.]
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.2
> Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
> 
> iQBFAwUBMTp7ayoZzwIn1bdtAQFJXgGAg8I4+IwZYrDI46bMj2nED+Dh0AeoMJVs
> PP10Ui5u46sXDAUjpMzJSwv5EqdIOEKy
> =611k
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

---
My prefered and soon to be permanent e-mail address: unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information