[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Petty Civil Disobedience

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Petty Civil Disobedience
From: Mutant Rob <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 20:36:23 -0500
Cc: [email protected]
Organization: None to speak of.
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

WARNING: the word "crypto" does not appear in this post (aside from the
	this warning message).

[email protected] wrote:
> I have added a pornographic image to my web site as an act of
> real civil disobedience.  I urge others to do the same.

Yawn.

I'd would not call it pornographic. Indecent (legalise), yeah. Porn?
No.  Don't make the same erroneous distinctions that the pro-CDA folx
make...

> In the course of doing this, I discovered that on windows, Netscape
> makes jpegs of naked pretty girls look like crap.

It would take much longer to process the image without dithering of
some sort.  Displaying jpegs in high quality is CPU intensive.

References:
- Re: Petty Civil Disobedience
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: Cut the mystical artist crap. (No crypto relevance here)
Next by Date: Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto over HAM radio?
Prev by thread: Re: Petty Civil Disobedience
Next by thread: Re: Petty Civil Disobedience
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread