[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cryptanalysis

To: [email protected] (E. ALLEN SMITH)
Subject: Re: Cryptanalysis
From: Mike Tighe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 09:10:28 -0600 (CST)
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "E. ALLEN SMITH" at Mar 9, 96 07:58:00 pm
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


>There are very good reasons to say little about "conventional
>cryptanalysis": it just doesn't matter much with modern ciphers, such as
>public key systems. Modern ciphers don't fall to conventional attacks based
>on word frequency, pattern analysis, etc.

I disagree with this, and think that in the next 10-25 years we will find
that most of the systems we are using today were as easily broken as the
systems of yester-year (Enigma, Japanese Codes ,etc).

References:
- Re: Cryptanalysis
  - From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: re: Video resolution
Next by Date: TWP on Crypto Keys
Prev by thread: Re: Cryptanalysis
Next by thread: Re: Cryptanalysis
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread