Re: Leahy Bill a Move to Slow Crypto Exports as Much as Possible

[jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 11:34 AM 3/11/96 -0800, Timothy C. May wrote:

>I was more thinking about "novel" applications: things related to digital
>cash, remailers, information markets, etc. These are things which are at a
>nascent stage, and nearly any of them can stalled for export by citing the
>absence of comparable competitors in Europe and Asia.
>
>Hence my concern that the clause is effectively an excuse for delaying
>crypto for as long as is practically possible. Not much of an improvement
>over what we have now--though established companies will no doubt be happy
>because they can export their fairly boring apps--and the new
>criminalization of crypto (when connected with any of the other thousands
>of felony-class crimes, such as swearing) is a step backward.
>
>--Tim May


You're exactly correct, here, Tim.  (I realize that you may not necessarily 
welcome an affirmation from me, but you are indeed right about your 
concerns.)  I've chosen to not focus on the export aspects; I'm glad to see 
you are ably raising them as problems.

Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMUSWlfqHVDBboB2dAQE7SgQAo5lk3XrbgH9vUQjukZfKhzKTsE9c0pKb
IRj9kzCirfJImb8MhxszevAm/ibGbgZssL2wX4u0osLZiClkwnh12gk39wNMeKuN
K3GTHrzuuk6xKH5cseaHXJcCi1CuiL5bj0KQDDsJnMIgvrlQeE2RnmxLKlJH1ngO
EO6ASNVSXto=
=GepQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----