[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: InfoWarCon V 1996: Call For Papers
On Sat, 16 Mar 1996, jim bell wrote:
> At 11:01 PM 3/16/96 -0500, [email protected] wrote:
> > C A L L F O R P A P E R S
> >
> > InfoWarCon 5, 1996
> > Fifth International Information Warfare Conference
> > "Dominating the Battlefields of Business and War"
> > September 5-6, 1996
> > Washington, DC
>
> I'm wondering if I should bother re-writing my "Assassination Politics"
> essay into the form of a paper and submitting it to these people. While it
> might nominally be considered right down their alley, from a subject
> standpoint, even a cursory look at the location (Washington, DC) and the
> invited people (large companies and military) suggest that my ideas would be
> just about as welcome as a yarmulke at a Nazi Party convention.
It didn't take an analysis of the sponsor or even the forum to determine
this.
>
> I'm not aware of the agenda (hidden or otherwise) of the sponsors, so
I don't know whether I should even bother. Many people aren't
particularly appreciative of being "one-upped" (not to mention made
obsolete) so it's not clear that they'd give me the time of day. Any
ideas as to their receptiveness?
I think you should keep your day job. As to "one-upping" the key figures
in the field. Good luck.
Hey, you asked.
> Jim Bell
> [email protected]
>
>
---
My prefered and soon to be permanent e-mail address: [email protected]
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information