[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
re: monsters et al
On Mon, 18 Mar 1996 [email protected] wrote:
> > Those who defend totalitarianism, regardless of the brand name of
> > totalitarianism, simply lie. It is as uncomplicated as that.
At 02:21 PM 3/18/96 -0800, Charles Bell wrote:
> Not very good point.
>
> Monsters come in many hues and `totalitarianism' is rarely total.
> Simplicity is in the mind of the beholder.
George Bernard Shaw, leader of the Fabian socialists, visited the
Soviet Union during Stalin's artificial famine and said "Where do you see
any food shortage", gesturing around. He was sitting in a restaurant
reserved exclusively for foreigners at the time, and there was indeed
excellent and abundant food in the restaurant.
Monsters, plain enough. Very simple. The complications only exist in
the clouded minds of those who employ doublethink.
Shaw also visited the Gulag, as did many famous English leftists: Here is
his report on it:
"Whereas in Britain a man enters prison a human being, and leaves prison
a criminal type, in Russia he entered prison a criminal type and would
come out an ordinary man but for the difficulty of inducing him to come
out at all. As far as I could make out they could all stay as long as
they liked.
"
>From which I reasonably conclude that if people like him gained power, they
would murder everybody like me.
I have heard many very similar tales from folk on Usenet concerning Cuba
and the like.
In addition to eradicating everyone like me, they would also eradicate their
dupes, their useful fools, such as H.G. Wells, who wrote of Stalin:
"[...] never met a man more candid, fair and honest, [...] no one is afraid
of him and everybody trusts him.
"
Since they did not give H.G. Wells a tour of the Gulag, I guess they suspected
that he might not have approved. Such a suspicion would doubtless have
proved fatal had his pals amongst the Fabian socialists gained power.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | [email protected]