Re: The return of the IPG Unbreakable System

[geeman@best.com]

>| I have entered into no agreements to inspect, test or validate the IPG
>| software suite.  In the absence of a valid contract for my services, I
>| shall not inspect, test or offer opinions regarding the security of this
>| product.  IPG Sales is specificly enjoined from using my nym in any
>| reference to validation of their product.  Further, IPG is cautioned
>| against using "cypherpunks" as a validation reference, as my
>| subscription to this mailing list could then be construed as
>| contributing to the claim of validation.  This action is intended to
>| guard against claims of the form "roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org has been
>| unable to break our system", among others.
>| 
>| Note to IPG: I review all contract offers.  Feel free to contact me for
>| terms, but be advised that I'm somewhat expensive.
>| 
>| Note to c'punks:  apologies for burning listwidth, but this looks like
>| the proper Publication of Record for this notice.
>
>	I'd like to add my name to Roy's letter.  I also received an
>unsoliceted (1700 line) copy of an algorithim.  I do intend to review
>it.  I strongly caution IPG against using my name in their
>advertising.  
>
>Adam
>
>

For my part, I invited them to submit their information to me; 
however, I have to jump on the wagon here and 
also state publicly that this implies no obligation on my part, 
nor my permission to use any information about me in their advertising or other 
material.  Thank you.

geeman@best.com

>