[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The return of the IPG Unbreakable System



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Roy M. Silvernail wrote:

| In list.cypherpunks, [email protected] writes:

| Since a copy of the IPG system has apparently arrived unsolicited in my
| mailbox this morning ("apparently" because I haven't unpacked or
| inspected the MIME message; "unsolicited" because I did not request it),
| I believe it's disclaimer time.
| 
| I have entered into no agreements to inspect, test or validate the IPG
| software suite.  In the absence of a valid contract for my services, I
| shall not inspect, test or offer opinions regarding the security of this
| product.  IPG Sales is specificly enjoined from using my nym in any
| reference to validation of their product.  Further, IPG is cautioned
| against using "cypherpunks" as a validation reference, as my
| subscription to this mailing list could then be construed as
| contributing to the claim of validation.  This action is intended to
| guard against claims of the form "[email protected] has been
| unable to break our system", among others.
| 
| Note to IPG: I review all contract offers.  Feel free to contact me for
| terms, but be advised that I'm somewhat expensive.
| 
| Note to c'punks:  apologies for burning listwidth, but this looks like
| the proper Publication of Record for this notice.

	I'd like to add my name to Roy's letter.  I also received an
unsoliceted (1700 line) copy of an algorithim.  I do intend to review
it.  I strongly caution IPG against using my name in their
advertising.  

Adam


- -- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCSAwUBMU7R6N5XP6PQNGpRAQEp+APlHLT35qjhK5buecy5srQg3kQFJ8vce1QR
25GDw5rqK21nT5g8QWKTq0gcWk9EFyFPqKzC8kfPn2BOQ/u7RI3kRHTCGvlOzy0C
X0fqqKgwXVeuYfShZGUmfz6Xeuiia208KJ6ZBkQkaK6o7J9ZKyZEoDob9k75B1ww
HBmVJxc=
=lg/D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----