[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The return of the IPG Unbreakable System
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
| In list.cypherpunks, [email protected] writes:
| Since a copy of the IPG system has apparently arrived unsolicited in my
| mailbox this morning ("apparently" because I haven't unpacked or
| inspected the MIME message; "unsolicited" because I did not request it),
| I believe it's disclaimer time.
|
| I have entered into no agreements to inspect, test or validate the IPG
| software suite. In the absence of a valid contract for my services, I
| shall not inspect, test or offer opinions regarding the security of this
| product. IPG Sales is specificly enjoined from using my nym in any
| reference to validation of their product. Further, IPG is cautioned
| against using "cypherpunks" as a validation reference, as my
| subscription to this mailing list could then be construed as
| contributing to the claim of validation. This action is intended to
| guard against claims of the form "[email protected] has been
| unable to break our system", among others.
|
| Note to IPG: I review all contract offers. Feel free to contact me for
| terms, but be advised that I'm somewhat expensive.
|
| Note to c'punks: apologies for burning listwidth, but this looks like
| the proper Publication of Record for this notice.
I'd like to add my name to Roy's letter. I also received an
unsoliceted (1700 line) copy of an algorithim. I do intend to review
it. I strongly caution IPG against using my name in their
advertising.
Adam
- --
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
-Hume
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCSAwUBMU7R6N5XP6PQNGpRAQEp+APlHLT35qjhK5buecy5srQg3kQFJ8vce1QR
25GDw5rqK21nT5g8QWKTq0gcWk9EFyFPqKzC8kfPn2BOQ/u7RI3kRHTCGvlOzy0C
X0fqqKgwXVeuYfShZGUmfz6Xeuiia208KJ6ZBkQkaK6o7J9ZKyZEoDob9k75B1ww
HBmVJxc=
=lg/D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----