[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPG message

To: John Pettitt <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: IPG message
From: Michael Froomkin <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 14:42:52 -0500 (EST)
Cc: cypherpunks <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

correct me if I'm wrong, but don't the federal direct mail marketing laws 
say that any unsolicited merchandise sent to a person becomes their 
property, regardless of any disclaimers to the contrary included in the 
package?

A. Michael Froomkin        | +1 (305) 284-4285; +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)
Associate Professor of Law | 
U. Miami School of Law     | [email protected]
P.O. Box 248087            | http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin
Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA | It's warm here.

References:
- Re: IPG message
  - From: John Pettitt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Upside's TAMING THE INTERNET: Special Report
Next by Date: PC: Using BIOS Wait function as a source of entropy?
Prev by thread: [NOISE] Re: IPG message
Next by thread: Re: IPG message
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread