[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS

To: [email protected], Sandy Sandfort <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS
From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 02:39:28 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Excerpts from mail: 25-Mar-96 Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS by
[email protected] 
> > Leahy Bill has NOT A CHANCE IN HELL of passing, and so is worth
> > supporting to raise awareness of crypto.
>  
> Washington is the last place where we wish to raise awareness of
> crypto

I disagree. We can let our opponents exclusively dictate the terms of
the debate, or we can let our view (and the truth) be heard.

-Declan

References:
- Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?
Next by Date: MUSE (Mail Ubiquitous Security Extensions) discussion starting
Prev by thread: Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS
Next by thread: Re: LIST OF SHAME VOLUNTEERS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread