[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: e$ seigniorage (and is this the cost of untracability?)
Jonathan:
On Sun, 7 Apr 1996 [email protected] wrote:
> Interest-bearing accounts cannot legally be anonymous--the IRS requires
To quote TCMay:
National boundaries aren't even speedbumps on the information
highway.
Who says the e$ has to be based in the US?
Andorra, Liechenstein, San Marino, St Pierre, all come
to mind as countries to investigate, because they are
outside of the United States. << Has St Pierre joined
NAFTA? If so, that rules them out. >>
xan
jonathon
[email protected]
**********************************************************************
* *
* Opinions expressed don't necessarily reflect my own views. *
* *
* There is no way that they can be construed to represent *
* any organization's views. *
* *
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
* ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/gr/graphology/home.html *
* *
***********************************************************************