[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Enforcing the CDA improperly may pervert Internet architecture

To: [email protected] (Bill Frantz)
Subject: Re: Enforcing the CDA improperly may pervert Internet architecture
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 1996 14:38:36 -0400
cc: "Declan B. McCullagh" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 09 Apr 1996 09:16:44 -0800." <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Bill Frantz writes:
> One of the migration paths suggested for IPV4 to IPV6 migration is to
> tunnel IPV4 packets within IPV6 packets.  IPV4 packets do not provide for
> an adult/minor tag, so until the transition to IPV6 is fairly well along,
> this approach will be ineffective.

Neither, for that matter, do IPv6 packets -- there is no provision for
them. Furthermore, were anyone to create an end to end header of that
sort, it would be eight bytes of wasted space in every packet in the
net, especially since the implementation of such a tag is a technical
impossibility as there is no way to force the originating system to
tell the truth.

The internet and the culture are coming into conflict in a big way,
and I don't believe that both of them can survive.

Perry

References:
- Re: Enforcing the CDA improperly may pervert Internet architecture
  - From: [email protected] (Bill Frantz)

Prev by Date: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?
Next by Date: Watch your language, Shabbir.
Prev by thread: Re: Enforcing the CDA improperly may pervert Internet architecture
Next by thread: Re: Enforcing the CDA improperly may pervert Internet architecture
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread