[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues



At 3:14 AM 4/24/96, jim bell wrote:

>As I recall from a message a day ago, you claimed that you saw no way that
>we could come to any kind of agreement as to the terms and conditions.  I'm
>willing to accept your word on this prediction.

And in another message, Black Unicorn wrote:

>I note for the record that I never predicted that the terms and
>conditions would be complex or unresolved, but that you would alter
>the claim and the logistics of the wager to the point where you might
>evade the consequences of loss.
>
>I note for the record that it was your post that originally supported its
>accuracy with a call for wagering.
>
>I note for the record......

And so the back-and-forth continues...taking up even more list space
arguing, waffling, finessing, rebutting, disputing, and on an on.

Exactly as several of us have predicted.

Give it a rest.

--Tim May

Boycott "Big Brother Inside" software!
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
[email protected]  408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Licensed Ontologist         | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."