[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WWW proxies?



At 14:37 5/5/96, Mark M. wrote:

>The same is also true for cpunk and penet-style remailers that do not use
>encryption.  You always have to trust remailer operators regardless of whether
>encryption is used or not.

You have to trust *one* of the remailer operators in the chain. If there is
no chain, you have to trust the sole remailer's ISP as well.

>The situation will become much better when there
>is some way to chain proxies and encrypt to each individual proxy.

That's why we need PipeNet.


Disclaimer: My opinions are my own, not those of my employer.

-- Lucky Green <mailto:[email protected]>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.