[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CryptoAnarchy: What's wrong with this picture?



From:	IN%"[email protected]"  "Black Unicorn" 29-APR-1996 02:21:27.65
To:	IN%"[email protected]"  "jim bell"
CC:	IN%"[email protected]"  "Cypherpunks"
Subj:	RE: CryptoAnarchy: What's wrong with this picture?

Received: from toad.com by mbcl.rutgers.edu (PMDF #12194) id
 <[email protected]>; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 02:18 EDT
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA27441 for
 cypherpunks-outgoing; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 19:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from polaris.mindport.net ([email protected]
 [205.219.167.2]) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA27428 for
 <[email protected]>; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 19:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unicorn@localhost) by polaris.mindport.net
 (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA07591; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 00:15:56 -0400
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 00:15:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Black Unicorn <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: CryptoAnarchy: What's wrong with this picture?
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
To: jim bell <[email protected]>
Cc: Cypherpunks <[email protected]>
Reply-to: Black Unicorn <[email protected]>
Message-id: <[email protected]>
X-Envelope-to: eallensmith
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Posted-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 00:15:56 -0400
X-Sender: [email protected]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 28 Apr 1996, jim bell wrote:

[...]

>While strong cryptography is powerful, and secure communications
>liberating, unplugging the phones would about cripple that 'weapon' for a
>while.  Any group rebelling based only on high technology communication is
>an extremely vulnerable group, both to widespread denial of service, and
>more specific 'surgical' attacks.  (Motorola stock anyone?)

	Wouldn't that partially depend on:
		A. the level of backups - packet radio as a backup for phones,
for instance... a reason I've been forwarding the stuff on radio to here.
		B. the necessity to the government of keeping what else may
depend on those phones - the economy - going.
	-Allen