[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PGP, Inc.

To: [email protected] (Tim Dierks)
Subject: Re: PGP, Inc.
From: [email protected] (Dan Weinstein)
Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 00:48:35 GMT
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <v02140b03adb92b2dbc65@[205.149.165.24]>
Organization: VPlus Network Inc.
References: <v02140b03adb92b2dbc65@[205.149.165.24]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

On Fri, 10 May 1996 10:22:24 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>
>The only effort they make is that when using the email-based CA, it mails
>the certificate to the address within, so it's not trivial to get a cert
>for an address that you don't have access to. (I'm not saying it's
>impossible, or even hard, just that it requires some skill and effort).

I don't believe this is correct.  They send you information after you
have created the cert verifying that you set it up, but nothing
requires a response and the key is transfered via http.

Dan Weinstein
[email protected]
http://www.vplus.com/~djw
PGP public key is available from my Home Page.
All opinions expressed above are mine.

"I understand by 'freedom of Spirit' something quite definite -
the unconditional will to say No, where it is dangerous to say
No.        
           Friedrich Nietzsche

References:
- Re: PGP, Inc.
  - From: [email protected] (Tim Dierks)

Prev by Date: Re: Bill Frantz, Churchill Club, Privacy
Next by Date: Re: PGP, Inc.
Prev by thread: Re: PGP, Inc.
Next by thread: Re: PGP, Inc.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread