[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber
From: brian dodds <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 11:10:59 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On Tue, 14 May 1996, jim bell wrote:

> But with 
> fiber transmission probably less than 1/100th the cost of older coaxial 
> transmission systems, per connection, it is unclear why they're even 
> continuing to meter LD phone calls.  

especially when 1Tb fiber is in practice - our phone calls will take only 
nanoseconds! :)

anything included in that as to why they used a dfb laser for channel 16? 
or is it something obvious i'm missing? 

i notice they're still using the encyclopedia/second benchmark..

				bri..

[email protected]
brian dodds, systems administration, jyacc, inc. wellesley, ma 
--617.431.7431x125
opinions expressed within are not necessarily my own or anyone elses..

References:
- Past one terabit/second on fiber
  - From: jim bell <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: (legal) Re: CDA Dispatch #10: Last Day in Court
Next by Date: Re: PRZ /PGP
Prev by thread: Past one terabit/second on fiber
Next by thread: Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread