[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Remailer Operator Liability?

To: [email protected], [email protected] (Zed)
Subject: Re: Remailer Operator Liability?
From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 1996 10:18:04 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 15-Jun-96 Re: Remailer Operator
Liabi.. by [email protected] 
> distributed to a minor who was using a nym. I think pressure on anonymous
> remailers is going to increase as various groups complain that the paw
> innocent widdle kiddies are "vulnerable to corruption"(or some bullshit like
> that) because their age can be hidden. Read the decision. The CDA _may_ be

This is true. Yesterday evening I interviewed the director of
enforcement for a TLA here in DC. He expressed his concern about
anonymous remailers and anonymity online. (More on this later.)

The word here in DC is "accountability."

-Declan

Follow-Ups:
- Cryptology and knot theory?
  - From: Krister Walfridsson <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Remailer Operator Liability?
  - From: [email protected] (Zed)

Prev by Date: Re: Comments on MicroPayments and the Web
Next by Date: Re: Comments on MicroPayments and the Web
Prev by thread: Re: Remailer Operator Liability?
Next by thread: Cryptology and knot theory?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread