[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rsync and md4
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 11.36 AM 7/1/96 -0400, David F. Ogren wrote:
>2.
>(quoted from Mr. Perry in an article entitled "MD5 breaks, etc.")
>
>> checked. However, the result is widely known. MD5 is *not*
>> something that should be trusted going forward, and I hope the next
>> version of PGP uses SHA-1.
>
>As I understand the current plans, PGP 3.0 _will_ incorporate a SHA option.
>In fact, I believe that there may already be "bootleg" versions that
>incorporate SHA.
What is the difference between SHA and SHA-1? Is this algorithm subject
to the same licensing as MD5?
Could someone point me to such a bootleg version for DOS, please?
Thanks.
===============================================================================
David Rosoff (nihongo o sukoshi dekiru) ----------------> [email protected]
For PGP key 0xD37692F9, finger [email protected]
0xD37692F9 Key fingerprint = 25 7D AA 01 85 41 43 89 50 5A 33 76 F1 F1 99 67
Non-technical beginner's guide to PGP ---> http://www.arc.unm.edu/~drosoff/pgp/
Anonymous ok, PGP ok. If it's not PGP-signed, you know that I didn't write it.
=== === === === === === === === === === === === === === === === === === === ===
"Truth is stranger than fiction, especially when truth is being defined by the
O.J. Simpson Defense Team." -Dave Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMdiLyBguzHDTdpL5AQHACgP/dmJJ6aQ0ZVlHN3WcAsPkaGoAypU/iCz4
F8HSK6nxbmG+pBd5+82Flzqpquy23Wfp+uk2l+CIv7oygoOMXVvadRLTQKXZEe+h
8/rk0pLATszwLakwa427P5xgGs4mfwvKjzBi0LpEIu1qkUmWYGQphl7KPAumdLc+
+3Wpc0INmHY=
=qXUq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----