Re: Lack of PGP signatures

[Charles Watt <watt@sware.com>]

-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Proc-Type: 4,MIC-CLEAR
Content-Domain: RFC822
Originator-Certificate:
 MIIBvzCCAWkCEFmOln6ip0w49CuyWr9vDVUwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQECBQAwWTELMAkG
 A1UEBhMCVVMxGDAWBgNVBAoTD1NlY3VyZVdhcmUgSW5jLjEXMBUGA1UECxMOU2Vj
 dXJlV2FyZSBQQ0ExFzAVBgNVBAsTDkVuZ2luZWVyaW5nIENBMB4XDTk1MDUwODIw
 MjMzNVoXDTk3MDUwNzIwMjMzNVowcDELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxGDAWBgNVBAoTD1Nl
 Y3VyZVdhcmUgSW5jLjEXMBUGA1UECxMOU2VjdXJlV2FyZSBQQ0ExFzAVBgNVBAsT
 DkVuZ2luZWVyaW5nIENBMRUwEwYDVQQDEwxDaGFybGVzIFdhdHQwWTAKBgRVCAEB
 AgICBANLADBIAkEM2ZSp7b6eqDqK5RbPFpd6DGSLjbpHOZU07pUcdgJXiduj9Ytf
 1rsmf/adaplQr+X5FeoIdT/bVSv2MUi3gY0eFwIDAQABMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUA
 A0EApEjzeBjiSnGImJXgeY1K8HWSufpJ2DpLBF7DYqqIVAX9H7gmfOJhfeGEYVjK
 aTxjgASxqHhzkx7PkOnL4JrN+Q==
MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
 BeMb0/+U7Gnp8Xx2J5GUFwFI2hLb0giw65Y+HudXPvuSMDdeBToKOQXkR/HvyvKr
 kM+gtqWFV3Q/2xKS6iIeYRc=

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> At  7:38 AM 7/3/96 +0000, Brad Shantz wrote:
> >PGP is a pain for encrypting or signing e-mail when you have to save 
> >your message out to a temp file, encrypt it, and load it back in to 
> >your mail package.
> 
> On my Mac I just entered this answer, cut it to the clipboard, launched
> PGP, clearsigned it, and pasted the result back into the Eudora window for
> the new mail.
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6
> 
> iQB1AwUBMdqyT9QgMXPCzT+1AQF35QMAiUM/5pVLwh41m0KncAiW+kms0d/GWn2W
> C8RNwQpzanwEBaNyCpd/MSPdMAz5+YRrstnmp9MqGwbKMbsW4frqb86Dxdpgp2/f
> qnwHvik9PlU/K81unAPij83MulSuysdJ
> =feiY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

With our mailers, you simply hit the reply key.  Of course, it is PEM
rather than PGP.  But with automated key management PEM can be a lot easier 
to use than PGP with its key ring -- and most implementations don't require 
you to use the restrictive IETF certificiate hierarchy.  See 
www.secureware.com

Charlie Watt
SecureWare, Inc.



-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----