[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I@Week on crypto export loophole 6/24/96
At 03:05 PM 7/12/96 -0400, Will Rodger wrote:
>>As I see it, the most important issue is not the legal status of the one
>>actually doing the export/mailing, but in fact the organization which is the
>>recipient and thus, the beneficiary of this act. _THAT_ organization will
>>be well-identified, yet will not have done anything obviously illegal. Is
>>there any indication that Baker was trying to distinguish between the one
>>physically mailing it, and those receiving it?
>
>Yup. He was speaking only of the US company.
Any indication about what the USG might be able to do, SPECIFICALLY, legally
or in retaliation?
Jim Bell
[email protected]