Re: Need PGP-awareness in common utilities

[bryce@digicash.com]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

I, Bryce wrote:
>
> Which is where the small payments to ratings producers from
> ratings consumers comes in.  Again this is just the
> quantification of a phenomena that we all take for granted.
> (Namely, that people who produce quality ratings are producing a
> value and trading/contributing it to others.)


Remo Pini <rp@rpini.com> wrote:
> 
> It sure sounds like I'll have to pay, so someone decides for me, wether some
> piece of info is important to me.


Key phrase here is "have to " as opposed to "choose to".  (Just 
like always...)


> Now, if that isn't the first step to censorship!


It's not.


One good way to get started on the road to censorship is to 
believe that everyone has a right to the means of publication.


Regards,

Bryce



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i
Comment: Auto-signed under Unix with 'BAP' Easy-PGP v1.1b2

iQB1AwUBMeZ6c0jbHy8sKZitAQHZagMAg0nRknUZDn0m5y57xJPKAMTygF5NRXZq
nkR7Ad5R2SYiHN5OPIsPQOtR2NNPEnjPL0PKjMtDvF4OkKZ/OTt3pQKE1dUN7Q8Y
FhHk9uSU7aSWqIaN4hItU0B1B1BeJSgJ
=jUlr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----