[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Chancellor Group (symbol = CHAG)

To: [email protected] (Cypherpunks)
Subject: Re: Chancellor Group (symbol = CHAG)
From: David Lesher <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 08:47:09 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Elliot Lee" at Jul 13, 96 02:26:43 am
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

> Ugghhh!
> 
> This guy's gotta get stopped somehow. Is there an Anti-SPAM list that
> would be more appropriate for this?

As I said, this is raw meat for the SEC. See their web page.
The more complaints, the better....

-- 
A host is a host from coast to [email protected]
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Chancellor Group (symbol = CHAG)
  - From: C Matthew Curtin <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Chancellor Group (symbol = CHAG)
  - From: Elliot Lee <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Reasonable validation of a software package
Next by Date: Re: Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used to defeat the ITAR?
Prev by thread: Re: Chancellor Group (symbol = CHAG)
Next by thread: Re: Chancellor Group (symbol = CHAG)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread