[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Opiated file systems

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Opiated file systems
From: Jim Gillogly <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 96 13:30:51 PDT
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 16 Jul 96 12:46:47 +0000. <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

"Deranged Mutant" <[email protected]> writes:
>A problem with a c'punk-style encrypted fs with source code and wide 
>distribution is, of course, that attackers will KNOW that there is a 
>duress key.

Good point.  This suggests a design desideratum for any such system should
be that the user may choose not to have a duress key, maintaining
semi-plausible deniability for those who choose to have one.

	Jim Gillogly
	23 Afterlithe S.R. 1996, 20:29

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Opiated file systems
  - From: Adam Back <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Opiated file systems
  - From: "Deranged Mutant" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: DES & IDEA built right into the Linux kernel...
Next by Date: Re: Seek-and-Destroy
Prev by thread: Re: Opiated file systems
Next by thread: Re: Opiated file systems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread