[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sternlight on C'punks
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: Sternlight on C'punks
- From: [email protected]
- Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 21:44:05 -0700
- Comments: This message is NOT from the person listed in the Fromline. It is from an automated software remailing service operating atthat address.THE PORTAL SYSTEM DOES NOT CONDONE OR APPROVE OF THE CONTENTS OF THISPOSTING. Please report problem mail to <[email protected]>.
- Sender: [email protected]
Dear Dave:
You are a helluva fine debater but you are also an unbelievably
irritating, sanctimonious son-of-a-bitch.
A CoWaRD
On Tue, 16 Jul 1996, David Sternlight wrote:
> At 10:54 AM -0700 7/16/96, Vladimir Z. Nuri wrote:
>
> >a suggestion: get a pseudonym!
>
> In my opinion (it's not "the truth") using a pseudonym except in force
> majeure circumstances such as a rape counseling group is cowardly. I think
> people should stand behind what they say, and the notion of Detweiler's
> having arguments with himself pseudonymously would be hilarious if it were
> not pathetic.
>
> In any case it wouldn't work for me since I suspect my literary style is
> sufficiently distinctive (at least for this sort of group) that I'd be
> spotted in a short time and then be the victim of a bunch of nasty "what
> have you got to hide" posts.
>
> And I'm not going to twist myself into a pretzel, stylistically speaking,
> just so some thug's nastiness can be avoided. I trust the good sense of
> wiser readers, and as Harry Truman said...
>
> David
>
>
>