[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: #E-CASH: PRODUCT OR SERVICE?
In article <[email protected]> Stig wrote:
: > Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 22:48:23 +0200 (MET DST)
: > From: Alex de Joode <[email protected]>
: > To: [email protected]
: > Subject: Re: #E-CASH: PRODUCT OR SERVICE?
: > Newsgroups: list.cypherpunks
: >
: > [..]
: > : "Ecash" is a registered trademark of DigiCash. It is registered
: > : with the Benelux trademark office and the United States
: > : trademark office. I believe that it is considered unwise to use
: > : minor variations on trademarked names, but I'm not an
: > : intellectual property rights lawyer.
: >
: > The Benelux (Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg) trademark laws
: > don't allow for slight variations, certainly not if there is a
: > change that people get confused, it is very very likey that the
: > judges of the benelux trademark court will decide that
: > ecash and e-cash are just to simular, and will thus confuse the
: > public. (art 5 lid 1 BMW)
: >
: > btw: I'm surprised DigiCash didn't file for a European Trademark,
: > but opted for Benelux and US protection.
: Perhaps this has already been voiced on the main list (I get a filtered
: helping or two of cypherpunks), but *I'm* surprised that such a generic name
: as 'Ecash' was granted trademark status anywhere.
: It's like giving Microsoft a trademark on the term 'Email'... It's nuts!
: Was the term ecash not in use before DigiCash showed up on the scene?
Untill januari 1st 1996 you could trademark anything in The Benelux.
A bank (ABM*AMRO) has a trademark on 'the bank'; they essentially
upgraded a generic name into a trademark, but the recent changes made
that impossible since the Benelux Trademark Buro has to check if a name
is a generic name and they now have the power to refuse a registration.
bEST Regards,
--
-AJ-