Re: Filtering out Queers is OK

["Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Fri, 19 Jul 1996, Troy Denkinger wrote:

> We have an interesting problem here, though.  You say that the government
> has no right to tell you how to set your filter; no doubt about that, imo.
> However, most people who use these filters are going to be quite happy to
> allow some corporate entity the privilege of setting their filters for them
> and, if the consumer should ask about criteria and such, they are told that
> that's a trade secret.  So, people will be allowing a corporate entity that
> exists for profit to set their filters for them.  This is a very scary thing
> and perhaps even more frightening than having the government do it.  I think
> that the people on this list tend to maintain a healthy scepticism toward
> the various TLAs, but we have to remember that a large, multinational
> corporation has not even got a sense of a greater "national good" or even
> "national security" to guide it.

However, parents are free not to purchase filtering software that claims that
their criteria is a trade secret.  I don't see this as a threat at all.  The
parents who refuse to buy this software don't have to worry about the filtering
software preventing little Johnny from visiting a site that has information
on homosexuality or subscribing to a computer science mailing list (which are
apparently blocked by some filtering software for some reason).

- -- Mark

PGP encrypted mail prefered
Key fingerprint = d61734f2800486ae6f79bfeb70f95348
http://www.voicenet.com/~markm/  


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBMe/8b7Zc+sv5siulAQGerAP+IWpgJ6hpbKOZcs1TPZwYLIqQLG+LccPD
nOMKVKmgMndzywuqO1lg59+VX2cA2qODwQ6SjQQ+gG2eImD6nPsPpD8Q/7D1hlHW
JhpPjp2UFt/xL3FtYG9/g2/4mYHx7Z0xVl51BNPHDiBMnyaskTzdk0yV2Tpo2T/8
EovM30/Lx2Q=
=qGzJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----