Re: LIMBAUGH ON TV

[snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>]

On Wed, 24 Jul 1996, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>                           SANDY SANDFORT
>  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
> 
> C'punks,
> On Wed, 24 Jul 1996 hallam@Etna.ai.mit.edu wrote:
> > It is shallow logic, but it is Rush's own logic. He promotes the
> > idea that success is measured in ecconomic terms. The failure of his
> > TV show demonstrates the failure of his ideas under the criteria 
> > which he himself espouses.
> Or maybe he is uping the ante.  Tell you what Phil, I'll bet you
> US$50 aganist your L25 (in other words, I giving you odds at the
> current rate of exchange) that Limbaugh have a nationally TV show
> on or before 1 October 1996.
> If you are willing to put your money where your mouth is, just
> say you agree to these terms in a post to the list.  After that,
> we can agree to appoint someone to declare a winner and hold the
> money in the meantime.  Any volunteers for the honor?

     If you trust me, I'll hold the cash under the following stipulations: 

     1) The exact terms of the bet are spelled out in writing and digitally
        signed by both parties. 
 
     2) That an agreement on the term "nationally TV show" is reached.

     3) That the payment is in the form of a cashiers check made out to the 
        me, and that each person send a SASE with their cashiers check so 
        that I can send the winner their check, without having to deal with 
        it.

Petro, Christopher C.
petro@suba.com <prefered for any non-list stuff>
snow@smoke.suba.com