[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "privatizing" phones?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 04.11 PM 7/26/96 -0700, Eric Murray wrote:
>It's a 46mhz analog model, newer phones use frequencies
>in the 900mhz range and/or digital encoding.
>The 900mhz range is one of those 'blocked' in most newer radio
>scanners, this is required by law as of a few years ago.
>Many scanners can have some or all of the locked-out
>ranges restored by suitable modification (i.e. removing
>a resistor). Many of these mods are posted on the net.
One of my friends has a Radio Shack scanner (the cat.
# of which I do not recall) which does pick up the 900MHz
range. We tried (unsuccessfully) to modify it according to
an internet posting. I don't know how old it is.
===============================================================================
David Rosoff (nihongo ga sukoshi dekiru) ---------------> [email protected]
PGP public key 0xD37692F9 -----> finger [email protected] or keyservers
0xD37692F9 Key fingerprint = 25 7D AA 01 85 41 43 89 50 5A 33 76 F1 F1 99 67
Do you know who's reading your email? ---> http://www.arc.unm.edu/~drosoff/pgp/
Is it a forgery? --- I have PGP signed all email and news posts since May 1996.
===============================================================================
"Relax. It's not a real alarm. They can't crack _Pentagon_ codes. Can they?" :p
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMfqQkRguzHDTdpL5AQFCuQP+ILE3NAbjEZ2p6d6WDIhoi9yNYafQOiSv
u00hink6Ylz8pQGP1xhQ9Bsn5pLyrS9Mck/UJ4Qw6omJBrE2LkgNy5Du8xdkqlQu
9MZaVqPXYphnGdAJ+oORXhvSkI9G0qYZPJjByypMd4Da92vqmDogrdTJFKgK21vh
OeTNyh8i+zQ=
=55JX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----