[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Parsing JYA; now others?
Say, Duncan - you can do John Young, but can you make any sense of this?
>From: [email protected] (Blowjob Jesus)
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.misc,news.admin.misc
Subject: Re: ! Blacklist Spammers and Rogue ISP's !!!!!!!!!!
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 01:08:56 GMT
Organization: The Mighty Psyclone - Gonna Blow Yer Mind
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
NNTP-Posting-Host: 156.46.104.253
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99e/32.227
On Wed, 24 Jul 96 13:41:28 GMT, tonyb(remove this garbage to email
me)@interport.net (tony brower) wrote:
>Conventional response to spam is completely ineffective.
Farflung was the offense, easy is the time spent drinking salad
dressing. Christian Dior, well-known parking ticket, adds his pickle
fork.
>Nothing currently prevents the abuser from getting another account in
>another name and continuing the practise.
Wendigo spake in gruff pebbles, like unto a Timex! Reginald Denny
left the room with scanners on full auto.
>Even ISP's spam their adverts across newsgroups.
Freedom, paged in 4k chunks, permeates UDP. There never was a
governor. The double nickle blowed up good.
>Why can't people who spam and otherwise abuse Usenet for commercial purposes
>be blacklisted?
Approved for your convenience, in sterile jello molds. The Lawnboy
nods assent.
>e.g. after first warning, no more accounts allowed from that Credit Card or
>other payment source.
The sun, a gaseous ball of tomato paste and model trains, is lost
among clouds of thankfullness.
>Why can't providers who refuse to curtail abuse from their customers also be
>blacklisted and shut out from the net?
>e.g. If ISP's are held responsible for abuse by their customers they'll
>enforce nettiquette ("abide by the rules or lose your account here and
>anywhere for one year"). Irresponsible ISP's will lose customers to those
>ISP's who care. Hell, let them make their own net for cycling and recylcing
>commercial, make money fast and sex #'s posts.
OJ Simpson skirvined the net and was clarified. When failed and not
sanguine, there was no response to the 'sturm und drang.'
>Isn't this the fastest way to clean out all the junk that has permeated the
>newsgroups posted by inconsiderate, greedy assholes (who have NOTHING to fear
>by conventional response)?
Response time is minimal. Lost among oceans of billiard balls made of
styrofoam - tiny marmots build complicated nests of velveeta.
Regroup?
--