[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Court challenge to AOL junk-mail blocks
If AOL wants to stop spammers, let them. They have every right to do so as
long as their agreement with their customers permits it. It's a matter of
contract law between AOL and its customers and should not involve the
spammers and a lawsuit brought by the spammers.
It seems as though the judge was snookered by the spammers' claim of U.S.
Mail-like service, free speech, blah. The right to free speech does
extend to corporations; in that way, it includes the right *not* to speak.
On Fri, 6 Sep 1996, Damaged Justice wrote:
> This is utter horseshit. AOL, like any private individual or organization,
> has the right to refuse service to anyone at any time for any reason, or
> even for no reason at all. The gubmint isn't doing SQUAT, except forcing
> AOL to allow the spammers access.
> http://yakko.cs.wmich.edu/~frogfarm ...for the best in unapproved information
> Hey, Bill Clinton: You suck, and those boys died! I hope you die!
> I feel a groove comin' on $ Freedom...yeah, right.
// [email protected] // I do not represent the EFF // [email protected] //