Re: exclusion/censorship and the law

[Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>]

On Thu, 7 Nov 1996, Greg Broiles wrote:

> So my impression is that you've got the tail end of a useful concept
> (ability to control is frequently a factor used to determine liability) but
> are making far too much out of it. One really big difference I see here is
> that editorial control of the Cpunks list has occurred once (in 4? 5? years
> of the list's existence), is on a per-person not a per-message basis, and
> *does not function to restrict who can send messages but only limits Vulis'
> ability to _receive_ them on his usual system(s)*.

I usually dislike "me too" messages, but in the case of legal discussion,
I think they can be useful.  Having said that:

I concur.

--
Forward complaints to : European Association of Envelope Manufactures
Finger for Public Key   Gutenbergstrasse 21;Postfach;CH-3001;Bern
Vote Monarchist         Switzerland