[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Bruce's 'Why Cryptography Is Hard' is still draft
----- Forwarded message from Phil Agre -----
>From [email protected] Sat Nov 9 05:16:00 1996
Resent-Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 20:50:17 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 20:50:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Phil Agre <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: notes
Resent-Message-ID: <"7C7uBC.A.H1G.I2Ahy"@weber>
Resent-From: [email protected]
Reply-To: [email protected]
X-URL: http://communication.ucsd.edu/pagre/rre.html
X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/1379
X-Loop: [email protected]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [email protected]
Notes on network computers, blind copies, democratic culture, monopolies,
and the idea of an Internet establishment...
As a periodic reminder, a Web archive of nearly all the RRE messages ever
sent can be found through http://communication.ucsd.edu/pagre/rre.html
It turns out that the article on cryptography by Bruce Schneier that I
forwarded from the Risks Digest the other day was actually an unfinished
draft that Peter Neumann sent out by mistake. Bruce asks that everyone
refrain from propagating that version around the net.
----- End of forwarded message from Phil Agre -----
--
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
-Hume