[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
From: Robert Hettinga <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 23:29:45 -0500
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9611131930.A5464-0100000@netcom14>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.94.961113200754.4470C-100000@polaris>
Sender: [email protected]

At 10:43 pm -0500 11/13/96, Lucky Green wrote:
>I agree. Support for soon to be patent free algrithms is a good thing. I
>hope that in version 4.0, after the users had time to migrate to
>DSS/ElGamal, PGP will fully move away from RSA.

Speaking of patent-free, :-), can you do blind signatures without RSA?

Cheers,
Bob Hettinga

-----------------
Robert Hettinga ([email protected])
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"The cost of anything is the foregone alternative" -- Walter Johnson
The e$ Home Page: http://www.vmeng.com/rah/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
  - From: Adam Shostack <[email protected]>
- Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
  - From: Lucky Green <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
  - From: Black Unicorn <[email protected]>
- Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
  - From: Lucky Green <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Black markets vs. cryptoanarchy
Next by Date: Re: Dossier on Tim May is Easily Obtainable
Prev by thread: Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
Next by thread: Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread