[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Announcement: Very Good Privacy



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

To: [email protected]
Date: Sun Dec 01 23:30:00 1996
> Dear Sir,
> 
> >     I'm not sure how an encryption product that uses encryption
> >     algorithms weaker than Pretty Good Privacy can be described
> >     as being better than PGP.  
> >
> >     Especially when all the algorithms listed have known problems
> >     of one kind, or another.   << And yes, I know that the known
> >     problems -- in some instances --- are entirely theoretical in
> >     nature.  >>
> 
> What puzzles me is that he included two cyphers that are _extremely_
>  easy to
> break, the vignere cypher and the ascii cypher. Why include these? And
>  what
> is his new permutation of RC4 and DES?
> 

Concur.  Also, let's see: only available for Win95/NT, no sources
available, and cyphers that are known to be weak - and that can
be used without any warnings whatsoever - anyone else watching
their Snake-Oil-O-Meter get pegged?

Give us some source code, port it to XWindows, and then maybe
we'll talk.

dave


- ----- David E. Smith, P O Box 324, Cape Girardeau MO USA 63702
[email protected]        http://www.prairienet.org/~dsmith
send mail with subject of "send pgp-key" for my PGP public key
"Remember: King Kong died for your sins" - Principia Discordia
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBMqJpYHEZTZHwCEpFAQFWPAf/Q2FoUPrgXAyjkWlLRQiRSV544TawvdL0
efdxOuRoGJ9jPSOBxm2KepfSw6Gl6yjwK7buuIB9LcMPMbp41Yn7Z4BTx1lY4fEQ
XjdKMZMGoDYfiFCP4Xm9D1vG0cX+eWUL9jxih3ZSGR8OjcypVNrTBxoSbO3q5pHu
69+ASfTdcyG4VySD/YJ2NM17P2wzU7BTNXawOIisaN87Us5hTNLtHt55/D5r5pcs
SPgLo1bBBP/z98+/r6flPtIk7LXwWPqWuJRMFp5FVUk+9/TfbdgsUT9tfl7VzABW
nY4z+zVvSuFBomVR5ON9wdNonG8YAeBCQGHy69oXhsErKDv6EXgbDQ==
=VeBI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----