[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PGP 5.0??

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: PGP 5.0??
From: [email protected] (John Anonymous MacDonald)
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 16:32:06 -0800
Comments: There is no way to determine the originator of this message.If you wish to be blocked from receiving all anonymous mail, sendyour request to the <[email protected]> mailing list.The operator of this particular remailer can be reached at<[email protected]>.
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

William Knowles <[email protected]> writes:

> Ares GodOfWar <[email protected]> writes:
>  
> Telnet to: all.net
> 
> login: your name
> Password: guest
> 
> Good Luck!

Wrong!  You must telnet to all.net, but the correct logname is
"getpgp" with no password.  It will ask you some questions (like are
you a US citizen), and then give you an export-controlled ftp
directory to go to.

As far as I know, however, PGP 5.0 is still in beta test, though you
can get a snapshot from there (in source form only).  They also have
source and binaries for the latest released version of PGP 3.

Does anyone know what happened to PGP 4, BTW?  Is that version number
just being skipped because it was used by Viacrypt or something?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PGP 5.0??
  - From: Andrew Loewenstern <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: PGP 5.0??
  - From: William Knowles <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: (no subject)
Next by Date: Re: Laptops, TEMPEST, chewing gum, and baling wire
Prev by thread: Re: PGP 5.0??
Next by thread: Re: PGP 5.0??
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread