[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Redlining
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 03:05 AM 12/11/96 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>Many people of good will find racial discrimination to be abhorrent. OTOH,
>I'm sure that as an attorney you are cognizant of the fact that financial
>institutions have a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders.
Are you suggesting that a fiduciary responsibility is violated by *not*
redlining? I stated before that all *real* qualifying factors remain in
force. The only irrelevant method to be eliminated is place of residence.
Granted, if a certain bank only made loans through direct mail campaigns or
some such, an argument *might* be made that risks are higher in certain
residential neighborhoods.
Breach of fiduciary duty would be thrown out almost immediately as a claim.
>
>In any case, have you given any consideration to taking your well-meaning
>but off-topic thoughts to any one of a number of perhaps more appropriate
fora?
>
Actually, I mentioned redlining as an aside to a totally different point.
Red has asserted, and I tend to agree, that this is actually on point. We
are discussing the possibilities of crypto anarchy.
Matt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMq8U4bpijqL8wiT1AQG+KgP9GOTcxgKTqR+AgUf2qiRjO97kV+QdQ7Tq
6PZIjQYmgSM6YS5Yg75A8iSD2soi9ZFfEM++6TGHqCZ1ViLpNTuQZJGjxB3mUs8D
U5eYiPmUEw9NC0z0CCwIPFyxouWtL4lhG3rUEopLuUuqB1OwPkbShIddkGxYRnqt
prsuIc6m314=
=zUqA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----