Re: Redlining

[Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>]

Matthew J. Miszewski wrote:
> I will not re-quote and rehash the argument thus far.  You do have a knack
> to ignore strong points (although admittedly not all) of your opponent in
> an argument.  Additionally, I am not trying to show anyone that you are a
> "bad person".  I was trying to carry-on civil discourse.  I know you really
> feel that you had no part in disrupting the discourse we started out in, I disagree.

[snip]

> My question was a real one.  The basis of it comes from my work with the
> homeless in which they have a difficult time getting a job because they
> have no "home address" to put on the forms, some do not have or remember
> their SSNs, etc. This causes a cyclic problem for the homeless. My question
> to Tim was, in the real world, how is the protection of this data feasible.

I believe the above paragraph could be the key to why a lot of argument
goes on unnecessarily - an economic model/theory may be a good one, but
is muddied by existing practice/legislation, i.e., the homeless are dis-
advantaged insofar as ID, address, credit and so on, which does not say
so much about the economic model as it does that the model is perturbed
by existing real-world compromises.

[remainder snipped]