RE: permanent invasion of privacy

[blanc <blancw@cnw.com>]

From:	Dale Thorn, who hasn't a clue

[on why the cpunks of late haven't discussed children's point of view]:
	Not lately?  And why is that?

Don't know, Dale.   Would everyone please send a message to Dale, 
explaining why you haven't been discussing this?
--

[on the possibility that abused children might be helped by the uses of 
encryption]:
	How is an abused child going to be helped by encryption?

Why are you on this list, Dale?
--

[on why, as I said, "empathy with children is not borne of government, but 
of a normal state of
mind"]:
	That's just rhetoric.  What normal state of mind? 	

Takes one to know one, Dale.
--

[on going out to alt.philosphy.objectivism to evoke detailed discussions of 
pertinence to his interest in benefitting from government programs]:

	In other words, if it doesn't offer something for me,
	the selfish adult, I don't wanna hear it.	

I'm not *obliged* to hear, it Dale.

    ..
Blanc