[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [NOT NOISE] Microsoft Crypto Service Provider API
On Wed, 25 Dec 1996 23:17:53 -0500, Blake Coverett wrote:
>And to think MS was good enough to provide an UpdateResource
>API that I haven't yet had a good reason to use.
Right thoughtful of them, wasn't it..? <g>
>> Interestingly enough, CSP signatures are held in the registry instead of
>> the binary, necessitating some install procedure for a given CSP. Not
>> to start rumors, but NT 4.0 does use threads to watch some registry
>> entries that control the version (workstation/server). Not much of a
>> stretch to imagine a thread that tracks (reports?) changes to
>
>Nope, a little experimentation shows you can change those entries
>while the system is running to your hearts contents. Try temporarily
>renaming the signature key of the base provider.
Now, yes. However I wonder how quickly a service pack would be released to
extend the monitor garbage...
# Chris Adams <[email protected]> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
# <[email protected]> | send mail with subject "send PGPKEY"
"That's our advantage at Microsoft; we set the standards and we can change them."
--- Karen Hargrove, Microsoft (quoted in the Feb 1993 Unix Review editorial)