[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hardening lists against spam attacks

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Hardening lists against spam attacks
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 11:00:16 -0500
Comments: Authenticated sender is <[email protected]>
Organization: Gill-Simpson, Inc.
Priority: normal
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Toto wrote:
> {snip} the source of any excessive increase could be put on 'hold'
> until the system operator has a chance to check on the validity
> Bill Frantz wrote:
> > 
> > The Christmas attack against this list shows the need to develop lists
> > which are resistant to attacks.

...and how long has Usenet had 'moderated' newsgroups?

( only as long as there have been individuals with the time and 
patience to screen the volume of input, and exercise thoughtful 
discretion in selecting the 'worthy' postings.)

  How smart an 'automatic' filter can clever folks design?   

for(;;) {
ECM;
ECCM;
}



 
Thomas M. McGhan
[email protected]
http://www.gill-simpson.com
voice:       (410) 467-3335
fax:         (410) 235-6961
pagenet:     (410) 716-1342
cellular:    (410) 241-9113
ICBM:        39.395N 76.469W

Prev by Date: No Subject
Next by Date: Tim May wants to Kill people!
Prev by thread: Re: Hardening lists against spam attacks
Next by thread: Re: Hardening lists against spam attacks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread