[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: premail.
- To: cypherpunks@toad.com
- Subject: Re: premail.
- From: Rich Graves <rcgraves@disposable.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jan 1997 19:43:40 -0800
- Organization: Fans of Nizkor, http://www.nizkor.org/objectives.html
- References: <199612310718.BAA02863@manifold.algebra.com> <199612310527.GAA12868@basement.replay.com> <19961231204939.16032.qmail@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
- Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Big Moma wrote:
>
> ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home) wrote:[...]
> > Maybe remailer operators should asks someone reputable to sign their
> > remailers' keys so that the users can easily verify the signatures.
>
> Yes, that is one part of it. Another part is that Raph should
> include a public PGP key in the premail program and then sign both the
> remailer-list and the pubring at kiwi.cs.berkeley.edu with it.
Those resources are automatically generated by programs running on a
machine of unverified security on the Internet. A PGP signature doesn't
mean much in such a situation.
-rich