[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ecash naysayers
At 9:56 AM -0800 1/4/97, Alan Bostick wrote:
>On Sat, 4 Jan 1997, Robert Hettinga wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 17:02:52 -0500
>> From: Roderick Simpson <[email protected]>
>> To: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Ecash naysayers
>>
>> Anyone heard a convincing naysayer of electronic cash? Who were they?
>>
>> Best,
>> Rod
>
>The propblem with that question is that as phrased it stacks the deck
>in favor of electronic cash. What is "convincing"? Find someone with a
>cogent critique of an electronic payments scheme or scheme, and I can
>guarantee that I can find someone, very likely on the WIRED editorial
>staff, who won't be "convinced" by it. What is a "naysayer"? Someone
...
I think the problem is even more obvious: the "Brain Tennis" forum is a
crystallization of the worst tendency in journalism today: having two
opposing views on any issue. As on television, where two talking heads take
opposite postions, suggesting a roughly even split in popular opinion (even
if popular opinion--not to mention the underlying actual truth--is tilted
95-5).
Caveat: I've only followed a few of these "brain tennis" things, which is
what I assume Simpson is recruiting for, and I was sorely disappointed. But
not surprised.
--Tim May
Just say "No" to "Big Brother Inside"
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, I know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
[email protected] 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^1398269 | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."